M von Schantz

M von Schantz

Mattias von Schantz is an author and the creator of the Lords of the Stars universe, a world he has been building and writing stories in for over 30 years. He's also the creator of the Deepwell Chronicles.

He is a computer scientist with an academic background in artificial intelligence and cognitive psychology. By day, he works as a software engineer, writing computer programs for a living.

You can now listen to audiobooks of some of his stories on YouTube, or visit the Lords of the Stars blog to learn more about his fictional sci-fi universe (see the link below).

registered at: Oct 09, 2024
Roles
  • Author
  • Badge

    badge-bronze

    bronze
    Achievement
    Thumbs up Level 1
    Comments Level 1
    Published Novel Level 4
    Published Chapter Level 6
    Novel Cover Upload Level 3
    Time(Daily access) Level 6



    Feb 28, 2026

    To:Alexander Vdolainen

    It is my opinion that the NTP programs of the 60s and 70s failed mainly for two reasons: politics, and because they were intended as drop-in replacements for chemical ground-to-orbit stages (Project Rover, for example, being an NTP upper stage for the Saturn V). Technically, they were viable, but their benefit during a handful of minutes of burn of an expendable rocket stage were limited, and when the Apollo 18+ missions were canceled and the US space program scaled down, there was no political support for continuing the development of NTP technology.

    All that is changing today in the real world, with genuine interest both from the US and the EU in NTP. This is partly driven by the new space race, partly by the recent resurgence of trust in fission power in general in society, partly by the development of small, lightweight nuclear reactors, and yes, just like you said, partly by advances in materials science. Though, although I root for nuclear thermal propulsion, I suspect nuclear electric propulsion will win out in the end.

    In my novel, though, I'm going for NTP mainly for two reasons: the amount of mass needed to be moved isn't really feasible with NEP, and also because later stories in my Lords of the Stars universe has already established propulsion principles that make more sense if humanity went the NTP route. Also, I should point out that the NTP drive in this chapter is a prototype unit for testing certain design principles, but it bears little resemblance to the drives we'll see in later chapters, which are space based, reusable and designed for continuous acceleration.

    icon-reaction-1
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-2
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-3
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-4
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-5
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-6
    Loading...
    0
    Scorched Earth
    Scorched Earth
    Chapter:7




    Feb 07, 2026

    To:Alexander Vdolainen

    Three decades ago, I was a pro-nuclear activist. My like-minded friends and I wrote opinion pieces promoting nuclear power in a Sweden that was decidedly anti-nuclear at that time. Fast forward 30 years, and I'm happy to say political opinion here is finally beginning to catch up with the technical reality we posited back then.

    I'm something of a MOND guy myself. Or perhaps more accurately, I'm concerned that decades of search for working dark matter and dark energy theories have come up with nothing provable, and the remaining hypotheses are increasingly becoming more and more... odd. And to me, that makes MOND win by default at the moment as the best non-dark matter theory around, though I don't rule out that the lack of evidence for MOND will one day make me lose faith in that as well.

    Anyway, in terms of my sci-fi classification, using MOND would make a story hard sci-fi, but not pure hard sci-fi. Again, this is just my personal definition and I fully respect that yours differs from mine. But I often bring up Clarke's Rendezvous with Rama as an example here. The book depends heavily on known, proven, existing physics - except for the last chapter where Rama turns on its non-Newtonian space drive. But to me, that single chapter is not enough to disqualify the entire Rendezvous from being hard sci-fi, because the space drive only adds on top of established physics. It doesn't say Newton or Einstein are wrong. It just adds extrapolated physics on top of that.

    In the context of FTL, that means any story where you literally go faster than light, to me, is soft sci-fi, because doing that explicitly goes against relativity. Bypassing the light speed limit while still retaining Einstein, on the other hand, I have no problem with, as long as it's not done with just handwaving. To me, that's still hard sci-fi, if it's done properly. But it's not *pure* hard sci-fi.

    But I think the main takeaway is that there are no official definitions of these sub-genres, and that even personal definitions can get blurry at times. The important thing is to be honest and to write stories we would enjoy reading ourselves.

    icon-reaction-1
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-2
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-3
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-4
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-5
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-6
    Loading...
    1
    Scorched Earth
    Scorched Earth
    Chapter:0


    Feb 06, 2026

    To:Alexander Vdolainen

    Hello! It's nice to run into another hard sci-fi author here. I really like your engineering-first approach to your writing.

    I usually divide "sci-fi" into four categories: science fantasy (stories set in a technological world without attempting to be scientific), soft science fiction (stories pretending to be scientific even though they aren't), hard science fiction (stories that stay true to known science but still can add extrapolated physics on top, and this is where I aim my own writing) and pure hard science fiction (stories that are based solely on known, proven scientific theories). But generally speaking, genre classifications are very personal, and there are no hard limits between the categories.

    My rant in the foreword about driving gasoline cars to the shop to buy ecological products was primarily meant as a comment on psychology, and not so much on technology. I personally find the human self-congratulatory tendency to do something trivial and then convince oneself that it's significant to be rather scary in this context. We reduce our carbon footprint by 1% and then sit back with our arms crossed, congratulating ourselves on what a great job we've done, when in reality we have to reduce it by 50% to avoid disaster (to be clear, those numbers are just made up for illustrative purposes).

    As for coal power plants, that's 19th-century tech that I can't see having a place in the modern world. Around here, the last coal plant was closed almost a decade ago. We're almost entirely nuclear and hydro.

    icon-reaction-1
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-2
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-3
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-4
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-5
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-6
    Loading...
    0
    Scorched Earth
    Scorched Earth
    Chapter:0