Feb 07, 2026
To:M von Schantz
Coal plants, those are just for illustrative purposes. I live not far away from you -- Finland -- there are no coal plants. We have too many 'green' sources (though that comes at a price: now the spot prices for electricity are way high, meaning no wind). I'm a supporter of building more nuclear fission plants to feed the grid.
Mmm, I have a joke about sci-fi classification: "the most advanced hard sci-fi I have read is 'string theory'". IMO, hard sci-fi should rely on real foundations (physics, economics, math, etc.), but that doesn't mean you're forbidden to use some already existing feasible, but still debatable theories as a given. Personally, I'm not a fan of the dark matter/energy theory; for me, MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) looks better. So, using it in my writings doesn't make my story soft sci-fi; it's still eligible as hard sci-fi.
However, adding FTL or FTL communications using the common story about entangled particles could make the entire story fall into the soft sci-fi or fantasy category. For example: The Three-Body Problem pretends to be hard sci-fi, but it's clearly soft sci-fi.