znf

znf

For me, it's book.

registered at: Jun 25, 2021
MyAnimeList iconMyAnimeList icon
Badge

badge-bronze

bronze
Achievement
Thumbs up Level 5
Comments Level 6
Published Chapter Level 4
Novel Cover Upload Level 3
Time(Daily access) Level 6
Semi-finalist - MAL x Honeyfeed Writing Contest 2021
Participant - MAL x Honeyfeed Writing Contest 2022



May 30, 2025

I read this after seeing it recommended.

I think some of the primary storylines like the government conspiracy were interesting, and you had the baseline of a few characters with potential. A lot of the ancillary subplots, though, I cared a lot less for.

For instance, maybe I just haven't read Derrida in a hot minute, but I don't really understand what the Derrida paper on differance added to the story besides a really bad bar joke (it was funny in its own highly self contained way maybe). The paper on the Croatian word "Razlika" was interesting; I'd never read it before so thanks for that, but it never actually addresses or gets to the root of what differance was, so it just feels like it was there to seem smart even though it felt like it had no thematic impact.

The actual human moments seemed like they were there in this story, and I wish the academics were replaced by them. The relationship between Ivan and the professor was interesting, but it was hard to get away from things that seemed just there to be pretentious. Why was there a chapter titled after Hegel's dialectics? I don't really know!

Finally, I'm sure you know this at least a little, but this story really needed an editor. The sentence writing itself was competent, even compelling at times, but there are so many grammatical inconsistencies that I'm trying to wrap myself around why they even exist.

There are small things, like you use "PM" and "p.m." interchangeably in dialogue and prose, even though I'd recommend that you simply stick to one time format. Then there is your use of em dashes, which was hard to really pin down. If it was just in prose, I wouldn't have minded as much because I could have chalked it up to a stylistic thing (though, you use em dashes to separate independent clauses while also using commas to perform the same function so...), but in dialogue, I'm pretty confused as to what they were supposed to represent a lot of the time. People weren't being cut off or switching to another mode.

You also used the dashes a lot less towards the end of the story in instances where you previously used them. I know this sounds nitpicky, but the novel you've written here isn't experimental. I think maintaining some convention makes it easier for your reader to not be thrown off by how you write.

Anyway, nice job finishing, and best of luck!

icon-reaction-1
Loading...
icon-reaction-2
Loading...
icon-reaction-3
Loading...
icon-reaction-4
Loading...
icon-reaction-5
Loading...
icon-reaction-6
Loading...
1
Under the Lilac Bush
Under the Lilac Bush
Chapter:23

May 12, 2025

I don't know what I said in my previous comment to your booka since it seems you removed it, so I hope I'm not retreading too much of the same ground (I don't think I am)?

Think this book has a lot of good like..."moments," idk what the right word is for them. I think the scene with the three maids (?) and the scene with Fred were highlights personally, but there were others too, like the misspelled signs and the scene in the hot springs where Reem/Sionn are naked. The scene with the firings too, I think your experience with work bled into this book a lot in a good way. I think your ability to just write these kind of moments props up the book as a whole.

That being said, I'm not gonna lie, I actually liked the side characters in most of these brief highlighted passages more than the main characters. I think there's something about the way you write them that brings them more to life in what short period they exist than the longer/stylized concentration on the characters. I think part of it has to do with the way you choose to densify (?) your novel. The information / jokes / references are highly concentrated. You have a handful of bits that you enjoy and you really refine the concept as you write.

I think that's a strength in some ways but it really magnifies when you write throwaway lines that don't really advance the humor or the characters (moreso the latter than the former). The one I can think of off the top of my head is the scene in either the first or second chapter where Reem (via the third person perspective) makes some off handed comment about someone's comment is why terrorism happens. This line bugged me so much that I basically didn't get over it for another two or three chapters. The humor doesn't really do it for me, I don't really see how it advances Reem's character in any meaningful way, and I think it's magnified by the more fruitful details that you put into your recurring jokes and world.

Uhhh, I guess this is all another way to say that I think a lot of the characterization of Reem, and some of the other characters, feels lacking because there's so many throwaway lines that I attribute more to you as a writer than to the actual characters themselves. There's no coherency around the terrorism line. It just seems like something you'd say in Discord as opposed to a thought that the characters would actually have themselves. I know often times the lines between those can be blurred, but in this particular case it's too out of left field (and not mentioned or referenced again afaik) to meaningfully make me think that the character is in any way associated with the thought, if that makes sense.

I've been reading some Terry Pratchett recently, specifically Going Postal, because it felt like something I might reference for something I'm going to write in the future. I can certainly see why you idolize him so much. I'm not sure how much of your writing you pull from him, but there is a particular attempt at wit and characters behaving in that aloof, perpendicular to social norm sort of way, but Pratchett always managed to write those in such a way that they became his characters, not the other way around.

I know this is all based on one line about terrorism, but anyway.

I think my point is that with how rushed things got by the end, I think you actually had plenty of density and words to execute on the concept perfectly, but I think the untenable pacing is a result of you not giving enough meaningful words to the characters and worlds themselves. You're a great humorist, and these bits per chapter are excellent, but the story always seemed like it was on the precipice of a breakthrough with the characters, and it just never got there for me.

To land on a positive note, your prose is markedly better than your last book. I'm not sure if you think that, but at least that's what I think. Both your dialogue and atmospheric writing are a step above. You should be proud of what you wrote regardless of any criticism I've written.

icon-reaction-1
Loading...
icon-reaction-2
Loading...
icon-reaction-3
Loading...
icon-reaction-4
Loading...
icon-reaction-5
Loading...
icon-reaction-6
Loading...
2
if the moon forgets to smile
Chapter:29


Jan 25, 2025

This was not bad. I think if you touched this up and reworked some things, depending on what happens in the contest, you should seriously consider querying agent somewhere who might look at this. Some of the things I found pretty displeasing about this might be a big plus to certain readers and editor. Just my two cents.

The complexity of the story is a bit hit or miss for me. There are some parts that are kind of cool like the undeclared reappearance of supposedly dead characters and the way that you mess with perspective, but I think there are other things that I simply do not care about. I think the obsession with underscoring/bolding individual letters is a bit too on the nose and I do not care for it. I was going to comment that I got interested in the actual site that you set up. I saw the password and assumed a Base64 encode and continued on with the story (I was on the train and intended to log on when I was home), but by the time I got back I found myself losing any interest in looking for the site.

Finally, from a plot perspective I don't think it's really all that difficult to follow, but I think you shoot yourself in the face by really plastering the themes of the book in the dual epilogues. It's almost like you didn't really trust the reader to "get it" and kinda gave a quick handholding session at the end just for safe keeping. I think you were going for a more bold entry, and then you played it too safe which kind of faceplants the ending for me.

Speaking of too safe, I also think some of the monologues and interiority is really heavy handed. I'm gonna assume you read a bit of Deleuze for this, but the psychology (and philosophy) feels all over the place and not particularly coherent. On the topic of themes, the whole "people can change" motif is fine but it gets layered on pretty thick by multiple characters and the drama verges on overdramatic in the second half. I'm not sure if this is trying to overcompensate for the fact that the characters are very dry in the first half, but it feels that way.

On the parallel setup. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with this, but I think the lack of variety between the chapters gets really exhausting. At multiple points, I felt like I was reading essentially Endless 35. The back and forth between what is effectively two simultaneous and very similar (yet very divergent) stories is kind of interesting, but it becomes really predictable. There were multiple times where I would roll my eyes because the endings of one chapter would be replicated in the next, with the only real difference being which characters are participating in the plot. For a plot that was meant to be a bit more complex, that it was so foreseeable really pulled me out of the experience.

What might actually have helped was if Arufa/Marsia's stories were segmented into two continuous parts, Arufa's story first, then Marsia's next (or the other way around, idc). I think this would solve two birds with one stone by firstly, giving you way more time to flesh out their characters (I'm not going to go two deep into this because this was already a really long comment, but they are *very* dry and don't really feel like characters to me, they just receive the plot that you've written them in), and two, it keeps the stories fresh when readers experience it twice in one sitting. The way it's currently done has some interesting formal layering to it but as a reading experience it just feels like reading a mirrored version of the previous chapter which is really boring after a while.

Anyway, all that being said, I'll just reiterate that if/when you touch this up, I'd really encourage you go search for someone to look over your manuscript. There's some interesting stuff that I don't think authors in sci-fi fantasy are really playing around with and you could maybe catch someone's eye. Best of luck with whatever writing you do next.

icon-reaction-1
Loading...
icon-reaction-2
Loading...
icon-reaction-3
Loading...
icon-reaction-4
Loading...
icon-reaction-5
Loading...
icon-reaction-6
Loading...
1
Parallel in Two [Saga Cover]
Parallel in Two
Chapter:34