Bubbles

Bubbles

I'm Bubbles.

Currently on hiatus.

registered at: Aug 13, 2020
MyAnimeList iconMyAnimeList icon
Roles
  • Author
  • Moderator
  • Badge

    badge-silver

    silver
    Achievement
    Thumbs up Level 5
    Comments Level 6
    Published Novel Level 2
    Published Chapter Level 6
    Novel Cover Upload Level 3
    Time(Daily access) Level 6
    Participant - MAL x Honeyfeed Writing Contest 2021
    Finalist - MAL x Honeyfeed Writing Contest 2022
    Participant - MAL x Honeyfeed Writing Contest 2023











    Jun 16, 2024

    Hello!

    I really enjoyed this piece. It has a pensive quality to it with an almost supernatural flair, seeing as the woman we're following appears to be timeless if I read the story right. Or perhaps, she is just the reification of the collective guilt of war. Either way, a very interesting interpretation of the prompt – visiting the Japan of the present, whilst coming from the Japan of the past.

    That being said, I find the story progression a little esoteric and unengaging as a whole. The first act (I will consider each scene break an act from hereon out, coalescing the latter two scenes into one) offers the reader a brief foray into the story world and concept, but does so in a very abstract manner. As a result, it's very difficult for me to latch onto anything concrete and differentiate between what is 'narrative' (i.e. real, part of the story) and what is 'reflective' (i.e. thought, part of the character's musings). The second act continues on the same pattern, featuring an episode that attempts to juxtapose the old with the new, and the protagonist's feelings on that. However, the way we are guided throughout these emotions is very distant and overphilosophical, making me have to work overtime to gauge the meaning – thereby missing out on the plot. It took me two reads to glean some aspects from the conversation – and I only afforded this a second read out of duty, not preference. As for the third act, the pattern repeats once more, so the point need not be belaboured. I did enjoy that one though, since it feels like the conclusion of the framing device. It also expresses the character's opinions (anxiety in the face of progress, alienation and a slight reticence and disgust) in a far more direct fashion, which benefits the story. Part of me wonders if this couldn't have happened earlier, so as to ground the story from the get-go, therefore allowing the subsequent character musings more direction.

    As for the style itself, I am unfortunately not too keen on it. There is a constant pivot between present and past, which I can appreciate might be stylistic, but it is also dissonant when framed the way it currently is (one past tense sentence surrounded by present). Perhaps the delineation can be made clearer? Separate paragraphs or formatting could assist there. Another thing which I struggle to believe is intentional, is the use of dialogue tags in the second act. It is very on the nose and pointless, as we can somewhat glean who is talking most of the time. And with such ostentatious tags as 'communicated' and 'opinionated' (why not opined?) they are a real pause in the reading experience.

    Best of luck in the competition,
    Bubbles~

    icon-reaction-1
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-2
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-3
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-4
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-5
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-6
    Loading...
    1
    Cover design by Nix with Canva
    There are Dead Bodies Buried Under the Cherry Trees
    Chapter:1

    Jun 16, 2024

    Hello.

    I'll begin by saying this is a very clever interpretation of the prompt. Whilst not at all following the spirit of it, which was more slice of life and romanticised (not romance!), I find the story pretty compelling as it stands. Though, I'll admit, it reads less like a short story, and more like a prequel oneshot meant to herald a larger project with Mis as its protagonist.

    The style is a little amateurish, I'm sorry to say. You often jump between tenses, and you employ a lot of 'scene-setting' language. Whenever you start to describe a scene, you resort to saying what its actors or props *are* instead of what they *are* doing. E.g. 'The leader of the meeting is an old man'. Oftentimes, you would want to show these details rather than tell them to the reader. Equally often, you would want to capture the actors of any scenes mid-action. It is much better to say something like "Out by the window, a spindly man watches the cars go by with a terrifying calm", than its 'scene-setting' equivalent of 'Out by the window is a spindly man, who watches the cars with terrifying calm.'

    The progression is also very fast. I feel like these scenes, in a vacuum, are fine and very revelatory. You have a great sense for these kinds of things, even if the execution isn't the best. However, as a whole, every episode is very brief and, therefore, leaves no impression. I can appreciate that this is a very compacted version of a larger narrative - should you have been given more than 3,000 words, this might've been different. However, you were not, and the requirement was for you to adapt to the word count accordingly, rather than try to cram your narrative into as small a mould as was allowed. I wonder if this story wouldn't have been better should Mis not exist in it. It would've been so much more unsettling (which is good in this case!) if we only saw Alma going through the motions of hunting down her mother, with the climax being her walking out the building with another teddy bear wearing her clothes. You could've used the 3k words to provide more depth into Alma's actions and characters, perhaps juxtaposing her childlike and easy going nature with her relentless and unforgiving verdict (which already happens, but it could be more poignant).

    I would like to read a revamped version of this story, not necessarily written for this workshop. It sounds like a nice concept. Unfortunately, as it stands, I am not too pleased with it. If you have any more questions, feel free to join our Discord server and you can ask me directly.

    Best of luck in the competition,
    Bubbles~

    icon-reaction-1
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-2
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-3
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-4
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-5
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-6
    Loading...
    0
    Like a Cherry Blossom
    Chapter:1


    Jun 14, 2024

    To:veryberrii

    Sure thing! I can't copy paste text on HF, so I'll have to transcribe it. Bear with me as I might make mistakes.

    I believe a lot of the 'showing movement' versus 'explaining it' comes from the way you phrase things.

    "A sharp pain shoots through her head."
    "The man is a few steps in front of her."
    "So, she does, and past the bridge is a path where she sees [...]"
    "She notices that neither of them spare her a glance."

    All of the examples above are explanatory, but for different reasons. Numbering them 1 through 4, we have
    1. Lack of deep POV. We are following the woman, but the pain is described as if she's not feeling it, rather as if someone external is remarking that she's feeling it. You can make it feel as if it's narrated from her perspective by adding something sensory to the feeling. "Her head rings with a sharp pain."
    2. "to be" used as a state verb; 'prop placement sentence'. It's rare that objects just *are* in the scene. They usually do something, and adding action helps to cement that. "A few steps in front, the man stops/watches on."
    3. As above, but with the added 'she sees'. If we're following her POV, verbs like 'she sees', 'she hears' are often implied (not always; there are stylistic values too). You can rephrase that as, "So, she does. Past the bridge stretches a path where [thing happens]"
    4. 'She notices'. As above, we are following her POV, so noticing is implied. Phrasing it as "An old couple rests on a park bench. Neither of them spare her a glance," retains the meaning, whilst removing the explanation.

    In medias res means starting in the middle of the action. It presupposes something exciting has happened before the story time (as in, before the time the story is written). As for clarifying the narrative, I'll admit I somehow managed to erase the word 'Death' from my mind when I wrote my comment - I blame the exhaustion. However, I think my point stands inasmuch as, ironically, those were the bits you could've afforded to explain. I think past the initial hint, you could've taken some more time to set the scenery as something esoteric, fantastic, or otherwise dissonant. Maybe the world distorts at the edges, or maybe the cherry blossoms are overbright, or the people's faces are washed away and stiff, or their motions are listless. Whilst I can appreciate subtlety is probably deployed here to give more weight to the eventual reveal, that reveal is surprisingly muted. Death just says, "I'm Death," then waxes on about the isekai question (do you want to be reborn?). I think the reader could've benefitted from a lot more reaction from the woman, whose knee-buckling is almost hidden by Death's short soliloquy. If anything, I think making these points a lot clearer and having them stand out could really create two pillars to anchor your story. As it stands, these moments don't feel in any way more or less significant than the rest, which makes the progression feel off.

    I can explain more, but this should suffice. Any more questions, feel free to join our Discord server and ask me directly.

    icon-reaction-1
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-2
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-3
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-4
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-5
    Loading...
    icon-reaction-6
    Loading...
    0
    Rebirth
    Chapter:1